Magna Carta: Witness to Feudal Crisis
Q#1 various circumstances that challenged the possibility of Feudalism as a viable social system, as one in which the good of everyone could be met.
Feudalism is the social system in medieval Europe whereby a vessel held land from a superior in exchange for allegiance and services. The most important problem that this system showed was the social order of it. In that time, people believed that your position in society (or order) was a gift of God. Furthermore, you stay in your social order for the rest of your life; creating very marked differences between the "superior" social positions. William the conqueror was the only owner of all the land making him the most powerful person in the land; and he "rented" the land to Norman Barons which rented it to knight and lesser nobles in order to get protection. At the lowest position of social status was the peasants and serfs, they did not have much rights. In addition of the hierarchal social differences, the king ruled with lawless tyranny. The Barons, which were mainly Norman, had to do everything the king said in order to preserve their lands.
The lands managed by the Barons were passed through the next Barons' generation, so the Barons' families always ruled the land.
William II ruled with tyranny and one of his deeds was that he accepted bribes from people to evade justice. It shows the extreme power that the king had because of the hierarchical feudal society. He also created stronger laws for the royal forests, where he hunted. He was murdered on this forest. Not many people liked him.
Henry I tried to put an end to the lawless times of William I and William II. The proclamation of the people was created by h ...