Its hard to find the morality for any death. A controlled environment at least gives the
choice to the patient. Accidents will occur true enough, but the mistake on someone life who
trusts your ideas in saving him or her without a sense of responsibility is the direct result of non-
consequentialist consideration. For example, lets say you have the responsablity of a child for
the first time. It's the child first time being with someone other than family and you forget to tell
the child to hold your hand when crossing the street and the child is hit by a car. Who is the
blame? Why, because it was forgotten by family to tell the child it makes everything alright
that you didn't warn the child either? If the wrong man is killed due to the mistake of a witness
in a case are they morally wrong? Why do the actions of a person in the medical field be any
different. To not knowingly give or neget to give is the same as doing it on purpose when
someone dies from the mistake.
How can the question of morality be asked by the other person outside the love ones who
does not have a clue on what is or is not best for the patient. Yet and still to knowing take a life is
just as morally wrong. To know the consequence and not try everything in your power to save but
is willing to kill sends a chill to my spine. Daily we as a people subconscious put our life in other
people hands . So when someone go farther then we want them to, it make us think if you do it to
the next person then it could be me. True fully, there isn't a moral difference in taking something you
& ...