The Argument from Design
The idea behind the Argument from Design states that God is the almighty creator, and also took part in the creation of all things we can see, touch, feel and smell. Things happening just by coincidence or as a mistake can be possible, but in order for it to be mistake, it must have been somebody's mistake, in this case God. I agree with this argument, because there is somewhat more evidence to back it up, rather than to contradict it. Sure there is no hard evidence, but it can be seen as acts of God. Why, because there could be more chances of God as being the ultimate creator of things.
I agree with the premises of this argument, because there are many examples to support it. To begin with, there are many different types of plants, and different species of animals on earth. Each kingdom lives in a specific environment depending on the type of plant or animal. Different kinds of plants need to be in a certain climate in order to grow and survive, the same with the animals. This amazing creator carefully arranged, organized and created each kingdom based on their needs of living. One example would be a camel living on a hot and dry desert. A camel can store more than nine-hundred pounds of water on a sac in their stomach. This allows them to store the water and drink it sip-by-sip, lasting them up to a month until the next refill. An example of a plant needed to be in the right climate would be a vegetable or like a watermelon. In order for it to grow it needs to be in a warm climate with the sun hitting it, and water in order for the dirt not to dry up. Given this argument, the creator came up with all these specific things for plants and animals to survive.
I find tha ...