I would like to discuss the normative ethics pertaining to the affair committed by Boeing corporate executive Mr. Stonecipher, and an unknown female executive, and whether he should have been forced to resign. Widespread corporate scandals of the last decade have heightened public awareness about self-dealing and other conflicts of interest in the corporate context. Congress responded by enacting federal legislation mandating corporate accountability and the formalization of policies governing business ethics in public companies. However, there are many circumstances that also give rise to conflicts of interest, only some of which are addressed by existing federal and state laws.
A conflict of interest is a divergence between different interests. In the employment context, conflicts of interest are commonplace and take many different forms, but generally arise when an employee's personal or private interests interfere or are likely to interfere with the employee's obligations to the employer. Such conflicts may arise from personal relationships (e.g., nepotism or romantic relationships), or from outside financial or professional relationships or interests (e.g., commitments to other employers, financial interest in a supplier). Conflicts can compromise, or be perceived as compromising, an employee's loyalty, objectivity, or other aspects of job performance. In addition, certain conflicts can result in legal liability or otherwise damage the employer's reputation with its employees and customers, and in the community.
There are business policies in place to prohibit employees from having affairs, Boeing had such a policy, and Mr. Stonecipher was in charge of enforcing these policies, but instead of following the company's policy. He himself evidently ...