SANTA CLARA, Calif.?At what point do more people joining an online social network or using a social software tool cause more harm than good?
While the answer may be elusive, panelists at the Supernova 2004 conference here agreed that the social dynamics around the use of burgeoning collaboration tools such as online social networking services, Weblogs and wikis are often as important as, if not more important than, the technologies themselves.
ADVERTISEMENT Technologists need to delve into theories of group dynamics to make the new tools useful, said Christopher Allen, founder of angel capital investment firm Alacrity Ventures. As an example, Allen cited anthropological research pinning the maximum effective group size in primate behavior at 150, the so-called Dunbar Number.
While that number may not be directly applicable to social software, the size of groups interacting through the tools does have limits that need to be considered, Allen said.
"How should tools evolve to take into account the subtlety of human behavior?" Allen asked. "We created tools to match our technological desires. ? For years, I've been thinking that we need to create tools more adapt to the way groups work."
In online social networks?such as Friendster Inc. or LinkedIn Ltd.?social groups can blossom briskly and grow to the hundreds. The meaning of the word "friend" itself can become confused, as Esther Dyson, editor in chief of tech industry newsletter Release 1.0, pointed at in opening the panel.
"Turn to the person on your left and say, 'Will you be my friend?'" Dyson said, in a reference to the practice of distributing e-mail invites to be someone's friend through online social networks.
"It's akin to friend inflation if ...