Research in the field of entrepreneurship has over the years increased, yet questions and consensus over issues in the field of entrepreneurship have yet to be answered or agreed upon. (Lazenby et al., pg. 2) Issues include the definition of entrepreneurship and whether or not entrepreneurs are born or trained. In this essay the arguments involved in defining entrepreneurs will not be analysed, but specific attention will be given to the argument on whether or not entrepreneurs are born or trained.
According to Reynolds et al. (2000) "entrepreneurs are people who have both the will (in other words, desire or motivation) and the skill (the ability) to project their ideas or schemes into the future, and, by backing their judgement with innovative action and persistence, turn those ideas into reality." (Reynolds et al., 2000, pg. 105) At times entrepreneurs can be defined as anyone that becomes an ?opportunity seeker.' (Anonymous, 1998, pg. 45) The difficulty found in analysing entrepreneurs is that no two entrepreneurs are the same, so it makes it harder to pin down exactly who is an entrepreneur. "Some are extroverts and some are introverts, some have family history of entrepreneurs whilst others do not, some start from poverty when others begin with wealth, some are young and some are old." (Lazeny et al., pg. 3)
An area that has captured the attention and imagination of scholars and academics in entrepreneurship is the classic question "are entrepreneurs made or born?" (Lazenby et al., pg. 3) Regarding this issue many different opinions and results have been given by various scholars and academics. Frakes et al. authors of Instinct, believe that people are born entrepreneurs and that individuals DNA, genetics and personality play a major role in whet ...