A View Of The Argument From Evil

When we think about the existence of evil several things come to mind.  Most people including myself begin to think of the most tragic events that have occurred throughout man's existence like the Holocaust, the wars throughout time, the terror attacks on September 11th, and the devastation caused by this summer's tsunami and Hurricane Katrina.  It seems almost impossible for us to not ask, why?  
    When considering this question and the existence of God in class we discussed the argument from evil for the non-existence of God.  The argument consists of several points beginning with how God is omnibenevolent and wants to prevent unnecessary evil.  God is also omnipotent, then He is able to prevent unnecessary evil.  God is also omniscient then He knows how to prevent unnecessary evil.  So if God omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient then there would be no unnecessary evil, but there is unnecessary evil.  Therefore a God can't exist with these features.  From this argument several assumed conclusions can be drawn including one given which is that a God can exist except without all of this features, but this leads to the thought of God being somewhat flawed which would anger some theists.  Theists try to avoid the though of God not being omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient. So the thought is if God created the universe and bound it to laws including natural and other possibly moral laws and He can't even breach them.  Evil then must be bound to good somehow.    
    I have heard that for every piece of evil there is a piece of good, in fact some people including theists take this notion a step further with the belief that that all evils in the world are ...
Word (s) : 921
Pages (s) : 4
View (s) : 709
Rank : 0
   
Report this paper
Please login to view the full paper